Members may please comment on following interesting discussion on www.iricen.gov.in
www.iricen.gov.in/modules...=2923#2923
www.iricen.gov.in/modules...=2923#2923
divisional circulars vis-a-vis HQ circulars
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 pankajp |
divisional circulars vis-a-vis HQ circulars |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 347 (06/12/07 21:54:38) |
|
||
|
scmitra |
Tenders | ||
|
Posts: 590 (06/13/07 23:03:46) |
I think the submission on this discussion about PCE being competent to issue circulars having financial implications is apocryphal in nature and may be apocalyptic.
scmitra |
||
|
ananth |
CE Circulars! | ||
|
Posts: 911 (06/14/07 20:30:05) |
Come again, Mr.Mitra! Arey yaar, zara common man angrezi likho! But yes, all CE Circulars on tenders should invariably have the concurrence of FA&CAO. Likewise, all policy circulars of Board having financial implications should have the stamp of FC/Railways. That is the norm which no Sr.DFM would compromise on.
I don't know how many divisions have created the disaster control rooms in the divisions but that policy letter doesn't bear the stamp of FC/Railways. Anyway, that is a topic in itself. But I believe that there should be uniformity in the way we deal with tenders and divisions should refer any contentious issue on this subject to HQ for instructions. Ananth Sr.DFM/BSP |
||
